Search for: "Downs v. State of California"
Results 781 - 800
of 6,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
Last week in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:55 am
(Gregg v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 12:45 pm
To my mind, the highlight was the filing of a petition by seventeen states in Case No. 22-1081, Ohio v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:28 pm
DauscherAs we previously reported here, the California Court of Appeals decided in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 8:07 am
Supreme Court has ruled in California v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
The 2016 enactment of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) led to an increase in trade secret cases in federal courts nationwide and in California, where they are usually joined with claims under the state’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
" The case, Arizona v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:18 am
They also allege that to strike down this voter-passed proposition “prevents California from deciding what appears on California grocery shelves. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Bayer Corp., 131 S.Ct. 2368 (2011), handed down in June. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
When the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision Riley v. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 9:44 am
National Association of Wheat Growers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
Brasuell, (D ID, filed 7/7/2014), alleges that the sole reason the Idaho State Veterans Cemetery refused her request to make these advance arrangements is Idaho's laws prohibiting recognition of Taylor's 2008 California marriage to her long-time partner. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 4:44 pm
But Ginsburg revised the state court's construction of state laws.Ginsburg doesn't even attempt to explain why it was wrong as a matter of constitutional principle for Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
(Defamation; Nuisance: Counterclaims) United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
It is a classic states v. federal argument that won't go away any time soon. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
