Search for: "Downs v. Taylor" Results 781 - 800 of 924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by Steve Hall
The stories of Alan Gell, Greg Taylor and Darryl Hunt are not hypothetical. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm by John Ross
That's because courts have shunned the only means available for obtaining relief: Bivens v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
Taylor Hall of 9to5Mac discusses the new Portraits watch face coming to watchOS 8 this Fall. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
  That changed in Payne v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am by The Legal Blog
This court is therefore unable to agree with the proposition laid down in Casio. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
FDA can't get down there and do it. [read post]