Search for: "ELLIS v. STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
President, to fulfill a priority you, your administration, and Congress have repeatedly stated of bringing home our American hostages still held in Iran,” the families wrote in a letter delivered Tuesday. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
(For example, in Telecommunications Research & Action v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
We of course like preemption, but after our side lost Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
E-mail: yvonne@tdoa.state.tx.us Texas Department on Aging 4900 North Lamar, 4th Floor Austin, TX 78751-2316 Phone: (512)424-6840; (800) 252-9240 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.tdoa.state.tx.us/index.htm AARP Texas 98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 750 Austin, TX 78701 Phone: (512) 480-9797 Fax: (512) 480-9799 Web: http://www.aarp.org/states/tx ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Disability Law Resource Project 2323 South Shepard Boulevard, Suite 1000 Houston, TX… [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:19 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 12:56 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett bucked this trend with her recent recusal from Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
Under the new NAGPRA regulations, one of the key innovations is the addition of specific deadlines that institutions must adhere to.[34] While museums are publicly supportive of the goals to streamline the repatriation process, some museums have argued that these timelines are unmanageable.[35] Museums have long blamed their delays in the NAGPRA repatriation process on a lack of resources.[36] Even the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) has stated that the timelines seemed… [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
Stephen Ellis of the Canadian Retransmission Collective pointed out that delays and retroactivity can case great problems even for the beneficiaries of such as lucrative tariff as retransmission, where there have been serious problems in the allocation of money years after the fact due to delay and retroactivity. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
TUESDAY Paper Session: Comparative History of Legal Cultures (Private Law)Tue, 6/20: 10:00 AM - 11:45 AM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Sala 455, Danubio Tower (4th Floor) · Chair—Andrés Botero Bernal, Industrial University of Santander · Discussant—Dong Jiang, Renmin University of China · A Comparison of… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Both patent law and trademark law are administered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
