Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 30,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 5:17 am
This is a rather frivolous argument because Section 108(f)(4) explicitly states that Section 108 does not affect a library’s fair use rights. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:02 pm
Obama for America v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
The Blocked Enforcement of the PWFA in Texas In State of Texas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:33 am
The decision was issued on February 18, 2016, in the case Rocheleau v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:51 pm
This state of affairs could now mean that public employers could gain constitutional rights at the expense of pubic employees. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:30 pm
II) State v. [read post]
Concepcion v. United States Affirms District Court’s Broad Discretion in Deciding Criminal Sentences
30 Jun 2022, 6:24 am
In Concepcion v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 11:05 pm
It is the failure of the trial court to ask the questions on the amended voir dire request that is the subject of this appeal.In Maryland, the sole purpose of voir dire is to ensure a fair and impartial jury by determining the existence of cause for disqualification and not, as in many other states, to include the intelligent exercise of preemptory challenges. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Key Statute and Precedent State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:08 pm
”[3] It also clearly stated that a positive test for illicit drugs could result in dismissal. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
The Supreme Court’s first libel case, Spiller v Joseph (Case Details here) will be heard on 26 and 27 July 2010. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
The main issue decided by the United States Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
In Pella v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:05 am
However, the Court, after providing some assistance to the pro se plaintiff's argument, permitted the plaintiff's claim that the defendant's alleged harassment states a plausible claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
In Gantler v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:31 pm
On December 9, 2014, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 9-0 decision that hourly warehouse workers at two Amazon.com warehouses in Nevada are not entitled to compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) for time spent waiting to undergo and going through security screens at the end of their shifts. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:48 am
In 2005, the Attorney General for New York began an investigation into lending practices by national banks in the State of New York and whether these practices violated New York’s fair-lending laws. [read post]
