Search for: "Green v. Greene et al" Results 781 - 800 of 875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 2:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
The refusal cites documentsD1: TSAI D-M ET AL: "The evaluation of normalized cross correlations for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2525-2535D2: TSAI D-M ET AL: "Fast normalized cross correlation for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2625-2631D3: R. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al., No. 8704-1464 (Philadelphia Cty. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:24 pm
Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC et al, Case No. 10-cv-07244 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:03 pm
Dice la wiki: the term is used in a derogatory sense to describe a person with such attention to detail that the obsession becomes an annoyance to others. - Link para descargar en MP3 el podcast con la entrevista a Scalia (son 12 Mb).- Todo vía Jurist, Scalia says 'so-called torture' may not be unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Trouble is… I just have a feeling The Home Office will forget to specify the ‘dress code’ and provide a guest list and we’ll have reports in the The Sun / The Mirror et al that Jacqui Smith was refused entry to her own office. [read post]
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]