Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 781 - 800 of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
His discussion notes that the impetus for the rule was Judge Posner's oft-cited opinion in Curtis 1000, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:44 am by Magdaleen Jooste
  The court issued an important short-opinion, In re Ivantis, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Telemarketing Associates, Inc., 538 U.S. 600 (2003), which held that the First Amendment does not bar fraud claims against charities for making false statements in an effort to solicit donations. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:57 pm by Philip Mann
Hershey's Chocolate, Inc. filed suit (Case No. 2:14-cv-00815-RSL) for Trademark Infringement in U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am by Ronald Collins
Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. (2013) brought the number of these opinions to ten. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
It’s a shame that most states don’t have a system like this — in addition to the public access, it allows for online filing (which is cheap and convenient) and is a far more reliable record of what has been filed than the haphazard hand-maintained systems of many state courts. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
A.V.E.L.A. and The Re-Emergence of Aesthetic Functionality in Trademark Merchandising Cases  By: Tracy Reilly This article analyzes the original Ninth Circuit opinion in Fleisher Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:09 am
Ben Franklin said if we don't hang together, we'll all hand separately. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:50 am by Woodrow Pollack
On the other hand, claims of the reissued patent that are not substantially identical to a claim in the original patent cannot be asserted against infringing activity that occurred before the date of the reissue. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:02 pm
See MGA Entertainment Inc et al Mattel Inc, Nos. 09-55673 and 09-55812 (9th Cir. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:36 pm by Larry
Now we run up against Energizer Battery, Inc. v.United States, in which the Court of International Trade addressed essentially the same question. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:36 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al., on the other hand, involves allegations relating to Forest Laboratories Inc.'s marketing of the drugs, and economic damages allegedly caused from the sale of Celexa or Lexapro. [read post]