Search for: "Harris v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 8:18 am
United States, State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:19 am
United States, State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Germany, Jr. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
Clayton County and Zarda v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
United States, No. 2: 2021 CV 04235-NKL (W.D. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Not an "Offense" to Violate Supervised Release in the Ninth - Jensen and Sec. 3146
21 Jan 2013, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Kurtz v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
United States, he does not engage with the court’s thorny prior precedent on this point that Aditya Bamzai attempted to distinguish in his law-professor amicus brief. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 5:06 am
United States is an abomination.(2) The United States is virtually unique in giving life tenure to judges on its apex/constitutional court. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Harris, Attorneys General, David S. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:57 pm
By Aida V. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
Clayton County and Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Madison stated: “By the constitution of the United States, the president is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion, and is accountable only to his country in his political character and to his own conscience. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 10:14 am
The United States District Court dismissed complaint as moot, and the owner appealed. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:16 pm
One Hope United, Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
In response to the PHE, Secretary Azar of the Department of Health and Human Services declared that DEA-registered practitioners in all areas of the United States may issue prescriptions for all schedule II-V controlled substances to patients for whom they have not conducted an in-person medical evaluation, provided all of the following conditions are met: The prescription is issued for a legitimate medical purpose by a practitioner acting in the usual course of his/her… [read post]
