Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 69,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2011, 10:42 am
On February 10, 2011, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Pineda v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:10 am
If Republicans take control, one could imagine a reversal of the holding that the state constitution contains controls on partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:08 am
The 4-3 decision in Priorities USA v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:36 pm
By Mitchel Wilson In Bridgeforth v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
A recent ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has reversed that decision, holding that tax-exempt status is not federal financial assistance for Title IX purposes. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:49 pm
Jones and Erica Shelley Nelson In Becerra Becerra v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
A recent ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has reversed that decision, holding that tax-exempt status is not federal financial assistance for Title IX purposes. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:13 pm
Today’s Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
Earlier this week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its first opinion reviewing a decision in which the District Court applied, or refused to apply, Fifield: Instant Technology LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
”[5] In Bush v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:32 am
In the case, Joerg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
Last week, in Friel v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
United States and Dalmazzi v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Wolfchild v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:32 am
The 9th holds that the sentencing court need only to state the reasons for a sentence so imposed, citing Rita v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 6:56 am
The state will continue to hold off on executions for capital crimes. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:12 am
Civil rights — Miranda rights — Deliberateness requirement For the Seibert holding to apply at all there must be an unwarned custodial interrogation followed by a warned custodial interrogation, carried out deliberately as a two-step ‘question first’ process to undermine the effectiveness of the Miranda warnings given at the beginning of the second interrogation. [read post]
