Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 781 - 800 of 7,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Le courrier est une preuve du virement de la taxe de recours et indique sous forme manuscrite le terme "fee for appeal", le numéro de dépôt du bevet ainsi que le nom du titulaire.La Chambre rejette le recours comme irrecevable.Selon les R.99(1)b) et c), l'acte de recours doit comporter l'indication de la décision attaquée et une requête définissant l'objet du recours.L'Opposante argumentait que la… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:55 am by Brian Hollar
What's so likeable about these new gizmos is that they're so tiny and simple and cheap, it's almost no effort to use them. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:06 am
There's been some talk about Ex parte Yamaguchi (USPTO/BPAI, August 28, 2008) being in tension with the 1981 case In re Wertheim, 646 F.2d 527 (CCPA 1981).Of course, in 1981, there were no provisional applications, and no statutes describing priority issues as to provisionals. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:23 am by Marie-Helene Rochon
La première phase du projet s’est terminé le 31 octobre 2016 dernier par la fin de la période des consultations publiques sur le sujet. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 9:49 am by Kaimipono D. Wenger
I'll buy some books because they're written by friends or colleagues (e.g., I don't write in privacy law, but I bought both of Dan's books). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
See In re Search of Apple E-mail, 2014 WL 945563 (U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Russell Jackson
In In re Sony Frand Wega KDF-E A 10/A20 Series Rear Projection HDTV Television Litigation, Lead Case No. 08-CV-2276-IEG (WVG), Slip op. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Décision Étant donné que la valeur de tous les biens bloqués qui peuvent être confisqués est de 4 213 101 $, l’amende de remplacement qui doit être imposée est fixée à 24 690 401 $. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
Trademark Cases"Professor Rebecca Tushnet Says the CAFC's Reasoning in In re Tam Was WrongRecommended Reading: Marc J. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:43 am by Douglas
Bônus cinematográfico: Casos de paternidade desconhecida são sempre cheios de emoção – que o diga Luke Skywalker. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:22 am
" In re McDonald’s Corp., 230 USPQ 304. 307 (TTAB1986)The Board has repeatedly rejected the argument that acquired distinctiveness eliminates surname significance under Section 2(e)(4). [read post]