Search for: "In re: Apple, Inc."
Results 781 - 800
of 1,245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2012, 12:52 pm
Apple, Inc., (In Re Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation) which submission was filed in the SDNY on July 6, 2012. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:08 pm
SeaChange Int'l, Inc., 809 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 7:42 am
Issue preclusion is a res judicata theory. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:56 am
Listen up: Apple Inc. is discussing opportunities to expand its online music services through a custom-radio service similar to Pandora Media Inc., The Wall Street Journal reports. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:25 am
In re Apple, Inc., Serial Nos. 77616247, 77844718, and 77844736 (August 28, 2012) [not precedential].Mere Descriptiveness: The PTO asserted that OPENCL "immediately identifies the common or generic name of an industry standard language and application programming interface," and therefore cannot be a trademark. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
Apple Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
The law is complicated as is the technology and it is our job to convince jurors, who are usually unfamiliar with the nuances of either the law or the technology, that we’re right and should win. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:13 am
” See Estee Lauder Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
And if you’re a lawyer in California, Texas, Illinois, Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York or New Jersey, you’re facing the most competition for legal services. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Oh, and Samsung owes Apple more than a billion dollars because it made smartphones in which, if you spread your fingers apart, it will zoom out on the document, smartphones in which the objects on the screen roll around and bounce back like you’re spinning the Wheel of Fortune. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Xtech, Inc., No. 11-3313 (7th Cir. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:50 pm
The public has an interest in knowing the facts about how major financial institutions like Citigroup Inc. conducted their business in the period leading up to the financial crisis, even if the parties prefer not to provide such facts. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
FTC.gov: Google Will Pay $22.5 Million to Settle FTC Charges it Misrepresented Privacy Assurances to Users of Apple's Safari Internet Browser Privacy Settlement is the Largest FTC Penalty Ever for Violation of a Commission Order Google Inc. has agreed to pay a record $22.5 million civil penalty to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it misrepresented to users of Apple Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Qualcomm Inc., 501 F.3d 297, 313–14 (3d Cir. 2007); Daniel G. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:13 pm
Apple, Inc., Civ. [read post]
