Search for: "In re: P Children " Results 781 - 800 of 1,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2015, 6:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In a re-certification audit, HPD reviews the paperwork that relates to current occupants' annual re-certifications of family composition and financial resources In' connection with the occupant's continued eligibility for housing subsidies. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you have dependent children, you may be able to file as qualifying widow(er) with dependent child for the two years following the year your spouse died. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 2:39 am by Matthias Weller
Curry-Sumner submitted several of such proposals, e.g. in relation to making more precise the geographical scope of the Regulation or for making the Regulation more coherent with the Hague Convention on Protection of Children in order to reduce complexity in international cases. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The husband has no other children that he must support. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 2:57 pm by familoo
But, as the Children’s Hospital Colorado has taught us through the power of You Tube, not pooping is not a long term option. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:07 pm
Through our children, family, colleagues, friends and acquaintances are spreading some kind of example, and even if we do not see, this example has a multiplier effect.] [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:53 am by Staci Zaretsky
If you’re depressed, please seek help. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Prods. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am by Lucy Reed
It is not drafted as some orders are with the confidential details in a separate annex to allow for publication of the terms and body of the order, and as such it cannot be published (an example of an order with an annex was in the Re P case – this was on the judiciary website, although it appears subsequently to have been removed. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am by familoo
It is not drafted as some orders are with the confidential details in a separate annex to allow for publication of the terms and body of the order, and as such it cannot be published (an example of an order with an annex was in the Re P case – this was on the judiciary website, although it appears subsequently to have been removed. [read post]