Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,071
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
French’s occur in the dissent: “And despite the dissent’s inclination to walk in lockstep with the federal courts on constitutional matters, we have repeatedly recognized that the Ohio Constitution contains greater protections than the federal Constitution in certain instances. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
Also writing on cyber matters, Michael J. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:57 am
” And Sen Graham engaged in this remarkable six-minute colloquy with Clapper and Rogers, which is really worth watching in full: Indeed, the whole hearing had an unusually bipartisan tone given the generally polarized political atmosphere of this particular moment. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
Graham v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:30 am
Graham On December 29, 2016, the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
” For its part Cox wanted the jury's decision reversed as "a matter of law". [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:52 pm
Rob Graham is an attorney here in town. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:52 pm
Rob Graham is an attorney here in town. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 3:52 pm
Rob Graham is an attorney here in town. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:32 am
Euan Graham, the Lowy Institute’s director of international security, called the announcement a “pretty high-end coercive signaling to China. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
Its chief sponsor is Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT), and the bill has nine Democratic and five Republican co-sponsors, including Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and Chuck Schumer (D-NY). [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 11:31 am
Graham v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:21 am
Republican Senators, including Lindsay Graham and John McCain, have pledged to conduct subcommittee investigations; with Senator Graham telling CNN that he wants Putin to “pay a price. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
Graham v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
On cert, the deputies ask (among other things): “whether the Ninth Circuit’s ‘provocation’ rule should be barred as it conflicts with Graham v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s “provocation” rule should be barred as it conflicts with Graham v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 8:26 am
Were the matter one of purely abstract constitutional theory, I would be tempted to side with the secessionists. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Bill Graham v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 1:36 pm
TeleflexInc., 550 U.S. 398, 406 (2007) (quoting Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
As an initial matter, we must recognize that much remains unknown. [read post]
