Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 781 - 800 of 2,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am by Tara Hofbauer
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, James Ely and Nick Sibilla suggest that by agreeing to decide Sveen v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
  Worse for the creditor was the fact that the Court found that the creditor should pay actual and punitive damages of $21,820.00.In James Bradley Collier v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
It is interesting to speculate how such a case might have been determined in the United States, with its rigorous protection of free expression under the First Amendment, particularly in the political context. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:31 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2014, a United States District Court in New Mexico sided with the Wiccans and the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented them. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Statistics show the imposition of the death penalty has sharply declined in the Lone Star state over the past two decades. [read post]
It's a victory that has significance for equal justice across the country because the reforms are more progressive than anything we've seen in any indigent defense case in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
As a federal judge, Ware has presided over some notable cases, such as Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 3:20 pm
Robertson's ruling came in the case of Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Findings cited during passage of two recent federal laws confirm that Congress understood that a child depicted in child abuse images is the primary victim of child exploitation crimes— including possession. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Rosalind English
That court will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1 if it proceeded on the basis of a judgment in relation to action taken to promote a legitimate public interest which was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”: James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123. [read post]