Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)" Results 781 - 800 of 2,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In last week’s post,  we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
(With the exception of a mid-September media law conference in central London featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, all other events we tracked this summer took place in the United States.) [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
”  Commentary on one of the cases, Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm by Amy Howe
The new term is already full of interesting cases, including the very first one on Monday, October 7: Kahler v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am by Eric Rassbach
In August 1876, the Blaine Amendment easily passed the Article V two-thirds threshold in the House, 180-7. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Agrees to indulge him for a further two minutes. 1225: Lord Garnier QC refers to a comment by Lord Carnwath that Parliament could have passed a vote of no confidence in the Prime Minister. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am by Rick Garnett
A little over two years ago, concurring in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
Last August, we blogged about the most recent such case: Carpenter v United States.Carpenter was summarized in our post:Tim Carpenter was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a series of armed robberies in Detroit and across Northern Ohio. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
   Case 1:19-cv-21725-JLK Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2019 Page 10 of 12   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISIONCASE NO.: 19-cv-21725-KINGJAVIER GARCIA-BENGOCHEA,Plaintiff,v.CARNIVAL CORPORATION d/b/a/ CARNIVALCRUISE LINE, a foreign corporation,Defendant. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm by Hilary Hurd
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]