Search for: "Johnson v. State of California"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
California Coastal Commission, which by definition implicate no compensation issues, fall outside the purview of the state-procedures rule outlined in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Baxter v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 9:59 am
The same is true of Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Religions 2019, 10, 300).Akinyemi Akinniyi, Islamic Identity, (May 6, 2019).Leti Volpp, Protecting the Nation from 'Honor Killings': The Construction of a Problem, 34 Constitutional Commentary 133 (2019).Darin Johnson, The Problem of the Terror Non-State: Rescuing International Law from ISIS and Boko Haram, (Brooklyn Law Review , Vol. 84, No. 2, 2019).Dr. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am
June 17, 2020), Johnson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
United States On 3 October 2018 the Federal Emergency Management Agency conducted a nationwide test of the Wireless Emergency Alert system. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 7:57 am
Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
California: Defense attorney must follow through on appeal after conviction. 1967 United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
Johnson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
California, 14-5442, involved whether a state court reviewing a Batson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:56 am
Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
” United States v. [read post]
