Search for: "KENT v. STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 7:22 am
The Court said that the “purpose” of § 1133 was “that the claimant be notified of the reasons for the denial of the claim and have a fair opportunity for review,” and interpreted this to apply to judicial review (quoting Kent v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:01 am
., et al v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 8:38 pm
30; M.B. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am
Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
And while occupying that role Robidoux violated the key ethical duties that lawyers owe: loyalty, confidentiality and candour (See, e.g., R. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
Kent v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:07 pm
Kent Greenfield is a Professor of Law at Boston College Law School. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
(Rachel asked to also thank UVA law librarian Kent Olson for his help with the underlying research). -- In light of the likely significance of the Court's opinion in Riley v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Medtonic, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) and Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
Kent Eubank, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
William Brutocao and Eric Bjorgum, lead trial attorney and team member in the case of the famed Los Angeles mural of Ed Ruscha by Kent Twitchell point out that “a mural is [a] piece of property comprising separate ownership rights of title, possession, copyright and moral rights”. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
State, 371 A.2d 699 (Md. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger asks why the Court’s decision in Plumhoff v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:04 am
Circuit — Tuaua v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am
Lyle Denniston explained the state of play for this blog; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
