Search for: "Kennedy v. The State Bar"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 7:24 am
In a rare decision that will earn plaudits from both the defense bar and many government attorneys, Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:11 am
Loving v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
In the words of Justice Kennedy, writing for a 5-4 majority and as the author of the third in a trilogy of gay rights cases: The Constitution . . . does not permit the State to bar same-sex couples from marriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex. . . . [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
Kennedy has the decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:01 pm
The decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:26 am
Today in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
In previous gay rights decisions, such as United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
The Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:21 am
Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773, 791 (1975)(“the fact that the State Bar is a state agency . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:22 am
The ruling in the case of Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Justice Kennedy continues walking through his opinion, including how the logic of Court’s decisions in Griggs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:34 am
Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan joined. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Today in a 5-4 decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
United States); and A free-speech challenge to a law barring “religious worship services” in a broadly open forum (The Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm
The majority opinion was supported by Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Kennedy. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas (with Kennedy and Thomas filing concurring opinions). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am
In the process, the Justices reiterated not only that, in federal habeas cases, petitioners have a high bar to overcome in showing that a state court’s harmless error determination was incorrect, but also that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) mandates deference to that determination. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:17 am
Today in Walker v. [read post]
