Search for: "Lawrence v. U.s" Results 781 - 800 of 1,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
  Plural marriage has long been criminal, just as gay sex was in a good part of the country until Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
After Lawrence Williams was “indicted for possessing a firearm as a felon” in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
For Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that “[o]pponents of President Barack Obama’s soon-to-be-implemented policy to cut carbon emissions from power plants are planning to use an unlikely and potentially potent weapon against him: the recent U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Abramson admitted that he had failed to look at “toxic” emails which appeared to show evidence of illegal activity. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:39 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Education Week’s The School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that,”[j]ust weeks after the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am by Timothy P. Flynn
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice Roberts'… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and related cases.[6]” The court in Ladd Furniture v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am
" Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that "U.S. top court agrees to weigh affirmative action in college admissions. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:27 am by JB
See Loving 388 U.S., at 12; Lawrence,539 U.S., at 566–567.Another way of putting this is the the debate between Justice Brennan and Justice Scalia in Michael H. v. [read post]