Search for: "Lists of Jurors v."
Results 781 - 800
of 1,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Plaintiff successfully moved for a new trial on the false identification charge based on instructional error and juror misconduct. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
Stone v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 6:54 pm
OPINIONID=14909In Bauder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 7:06 am
In dumping the suit, Florida's Judge Gary Farmer ripped into traditional judicial style style in this concurring opinion in Funny Cide Ventures v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:19 pm
Third, he considered and dismissed the risk of abuse of process arguments in criminal trials – in particular, the prospect that it will be suggested that jurors will be affected by pre-trial publicity such that a fair trial is not possible, relying inter alia, on R v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:35 am
Mar. 28, 2008) (jury selection, juror confusion, disqualification)[11] Alfonso v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 3:33 pm
” – Strauder v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
There are only two cases involving epidemiological evidence before 1970 on the list. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Preventing confusion and lack of witness credibility Especially in oral testimony, pseudonyms can be confusing to the witnesses and thus to jurors. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
In 2008, SCOTUS dealt with this doctrine in Giles v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 11:28 am
On April 15, the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1936) dealt with the question of juror disqualification for implied bias in criminal cases because the juror was an employee of one of the litigants. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its chance of being granted.Title: Edwards v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:27 am
More likely, it's that he didn't think of using it in court to learn more about the jurors. [read post]
