Search for: "MATTER OF SHAW"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 11:31 am
It wouldn't hire someone with an empty head.It's also important to consider here that Judge Shaw is not at all biased against patent holders like Motorola. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
Rule 702’s requirement of knowledge that will assist the trier of fact is designed to prevent expert witnesses from testifying about matters within the common understanding of the jury, and about which the jurors can reason without help from an expert witness. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
Because the Supreme Court is the highest court of appeals in the UK for civil matters, the Supreme Court’s decision in Vestergaard is particularly notable and is binding precedent throughout the UK, including Scotland and Northern Ireland (whose judicial systems are largely separate from those in England and Wales). [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
In 1995 he was one of three lawyers who argued Shaw v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:37 pm
Judge Shaw disagreed with the defendants in this action on the import of InterDigital's insistence on worldwide license deals. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Does it matter how brutally? [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
If it should turn out in the present situation that the evidence is no better or even worse than it was in BMG (and I make no comment on this point at this time), then that would be the end of the matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
., 669 F.2d 345, 346 (5th Cir.1982) (holding that accumulated leave time is part of total wages and payable in addition to maintenance); Shaw v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 8:17 pm
& Seyfarth Shaw LLP Nike sought to “develop a solution for the high-volume, largely routine transactional work that previously absorbed a significant amount of their time. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:17 pm
& Seyfarth Shaw LLP Nike sought to “develop a solution for the high-volume, largely routine transactional work that previously absorbed a significant amount of their time. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:26 am
Therefore, Judge Shaw identified no violation. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
This includes an index of decisions by B# and subject matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Shaw Envt’l & Infrastructure, Inc., No. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:06 pm
The next major step will unfold in the Federal Court on June 25,2013 as Voltage continues to seek the disclosure of the names and addresses of thousands of customers of Teksavvy, an indie ISP that has vigorously taken the position that it takes no position in this matter and has spent at least $190,000 to do so. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
But what of other matters? [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
But what of other matters? [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:16 pm
Its litigation results are too miserable to justify even a fraction of that amount.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:25 am
Wright also suggested that the attorneys involved be disbarred and says that they warrant criminal investigation, turning the matter over to grand juries, the IRS and both state and federal bar associations. 2: ‘They Stole It’: Dr. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:11 am
No doubt there were some crafty individuals who could have taken it to the USPTO and emerged with a patent -- but that's another matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 8:08 am
Apparently Microsoft has identified at least one defense that might allow it to prevail but which Judge Shaw threw out. [read post]
