Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 781 - 800 of 1,912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am by Paul Cruikshank
The preservation of 5 Dorset byways is not, to my mind at least, a matter of national importance – but I don’t live in Dorest. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Clark v Manchester City Council [2015] UKUT 129 (LC) Mr Clark had a licence for an HMO for not more than 5 occupants. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am by Leisha Bond, St Philips
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm by Bill Otis
 It's true that a shrewd and hard-working defense lawyer (say Judy Clarke, who now has her hands full with the Boston Marathon bomber) can sway a tribunal; this is one reason lawyers are paid more than most other people. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm
And requests for First Amendment exemptions from speech- and press-neutral laws are indeed generally rejected (see, e.g., Clark v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:31 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The leading judgment was given by Jackson LJ (with whom Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ agreed). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
The Strasbourg Court criticised recoverable success fees in MGN v UK (2011) 53 EHRR 5 and disagreed with the view of the Supreme Court in an earlier hearing of the matter. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
As Lord Clarke said at [111] he would have very much liked to be able to agree with Lord Kerr, but he did not think there was a proper basis for so doing. [read post]