Search for: "Meyers v. State"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,043
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or her interests as a… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:06 am
Egnotovich v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
: General Motors LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:59 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently had the opportunity to consider some of these issues in the case of Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Medinol Limited (EPLAW) EWHC (Pat): Costs order knocks spots off pimple patent: Select Healthcare v Cromptons (PatLit) EWPCC: ‘User’ basis available for assessment of trade mark damages: National Guild of Removers & Storers Ltd v Silveria (t/a C S Movers) (IP finance) Do it by the book: case management and questions for reference: Westwood v Knight; SAS Institute v World Programming (IPKat) EWCA finds Grimme’s agricultural machinery patent… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
Meyer stated that the purpose of the interview was to establish [Rogozin]'s admissibility into the United States, and to prevent the entry of contraband such as child pornography. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:37 am
Supreme Court decided Roper v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:30 am
The Healthy Workplace Bill has not been enacted in any state but has been proposed in 17 states, including California. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:46 am
For example, in CSEA v Lakeland Central School District, the Appellate Division rejected the School District’s claim that CSEA’s action for damages “for breach of a collective bargaining agreement” should be dismissed because CSEA had not complied with the “notice of claim” requirements set out in Section 3813(1).The Court said that “the collective bargaining agreement entered into by the parties contained detailed grievance procedures and this… [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:55 am
The ruling in Meadoux v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 am
The following guest post comes from Stuart Meyer, a Partner with Fenwick & West. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 am
The following guest post comes from Stuart Meyer, a Partner with Fenwick & West. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:19 am
This approach still appears to be viable in Wisconsin and Mississippi, see Citizens State Bank v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recent decision in Pelache v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:49 am
Meyer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
In Elmsford UFSD v Alfred G. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm
Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S. [read post]
