Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57; Infineon Technologies AG v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:31 am
I just learned from a spokeswoman for the Munich I Regional Court that a Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
In the United States the parties want a final FRAND ruling (they disagree only on details), which Google will then appeal. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:00 am
Although the Court relied exclusively on other district court decisions with regard to its injury in fact ruling, the outcome here is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am
But, in an apparent blow to NSA, United States District Court Judge Jeffrey White has denied the Justice Department’s request to suspend legal action in the case of First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Robart in Seattle (Western District of Washington) pioneered this field with his 207-page rate-setting opinion in Microsoft v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:43 am
Obviously, even a broader ban is useful only if actually enforced, but that's what Microsoft is fighting for.This morning the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed in part with Microsoft that the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) should have ordered an import ban against Motorola's Android-based devices over more than just one patent. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
” —New York Times Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
First, take Google’s reliance on the 1973 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:47 am
(“Sunovion”) appealsfrom the decision of the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey granting summary judgmentthat Dr. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:11 pm
Samsung, Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
The traditional understanding of a domestic industry would be that a company, wherever headquartered, has some significant commercial activities in the United States relating to products that practice the patented invention. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Bush signed into law a repatriation holiday, or corporate tax holiday, allowing multinational companies holding funds offshore to bring those into the United States at a reduced tax rate of just 5.25%, dramatically lower than the 35% statutory rate. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
At least in Germany, the largest European market, there is no eBay v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
A month ago I reported on a Microsoft letter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, asking Judge James Robart for permission to bring a motion to "renew and expand" an anti-suit injunction so as to bar Google's Motorola Mobility from suing Microsoft in Mannheim, Germany, for royalties on patents declared essential to the H.264 video codec standard. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit scheduled the "Posner appeal" (Apple v. [read post]
