Search for: "Mock v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 881
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2008, 1:40 pm
[Disclosure: Dill and I were both expert witnesses on behalf of Jennings and the other plaintiffs in the Jennings v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
We in fact have a tradition of mocking the claim that all men are created equal. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:27 am
The sources have to be applied in the specific order of precedence stated by Art. 3 EGBGB: (1.) [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That point was made clear by the Supreme Court just two months ago when, in the case of Matal v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am by Veronika Gaertner
Sebastian Mock: “Internationale Streitgenossenzuständigkeit” - the English abstract reads as follows: The international jurisdiction for claims against several defendants at the domicile of one of the defendants as today established by Art. 6 No. 1 Brussels I Regulation is unknown in several member states and consequently causes general doubts due to the existing possibilities of manipulation in this context. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
Thus anticipating the political philosophy of Hobbes, Machiavelli states that the moral and justice does not pre-exist to the state, but they are result of state. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Voluntary referral is not allowed if one party is the state, if the dispute relates to recovery of property, money or other dues on behalf of the state or if the Attorney General has instituted proceedings for any offence. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
Following its attack last week on Camp Bastion in southern Afghanistan, the militants released a weird video featuring training regimens and battle preparations that include a toy mock-up of the base. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
  (Some requirements for expert testimony really are substantive state law, but that is a different issue.) [read post]