Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 781 - 800 of 3,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Ever wondered what it's like to argue before the Supreme Court? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
See also Adam Liptak, “Doctor’s Testimony Leads To a Complex Legal Fight,” N.Y. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Romanoff v Trustees of the Sheryl Romanoff Irrevocable Grantor Trust. 2020 NY Slip Op 31150(U) May 4, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157641/2014 Judge: James E. d’Auguste illustrates how the thicket grows. [read post]
22 May 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
") Friends, the Georgia Supreme Court has "long interpreted the Georgia Constitution as protecting a right to work in one's chosen profession free from unreasonable government interference. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:45 am by Jeff DeFrancisco
The plaintiff opposed the medical providers’ motion, insisting that the trial court had jurisdiction over them under the New York long-arm statute codified at N.Y. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:52 pm by Howard Bashman
“Secrecy of Trump’s taxes, financial records on the line in Supreme Court arguments; House committees and a N.Y. prosecutor want to get their hands on the president’s documents in twin blockbuster cases on Tuesday”: Pete Williams of NBC News has this report. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]
2 May 2020, 12:36 pm by Kathy Kapusta
Supreme Court action Justices agree to hear ACA individual mandate case Section 1981 demands a but-for causation pleading standard Federal courts of appeal decisions Third Circuit overturns ruling that UberBLACK limousine drivers were not employees. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Lynn McDonough
Supreme Court denied the state’s request for emergency relief. [read post]