Search for: "P. v. Roberts" Results 781 - 800 of 2,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Despite reports of an odd journal here or there “abolishing” p-values, most medical journals continue to require the presentation of either p-values or confidence intervals. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
 Site-specific cat.Sculpture by Wang Du, exhibited by the Museum of Cat in 2017Moreover, as described in the chapter by Donn Zaretsky,** we encounter the dispute between installation artist Christoph Büchel and the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art as evidence of VARA’s [relative] success at granting relief to artists when “a museum behaves badly” (citing New York Times art critic Robert Smith’s, p. 50, ‘Training Ground for Moral… [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Il n’a pas erré en rejetant l’interprétation proposée par les appelants de R. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 9:38 am by Andrew Appel
[See also: Robert Caro, Means of Ascent, 1991, Chapter 13]  In the 19th and early 20th century, insider election fraud was widespread in the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:21 am by Scott Bomboy
” In our Interactive Constitution, scholars Robert P. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Perhaps Chief Justice John Roberts decided to hang on to all of the long-conference relists so the new guy would have a chance to weigh in on them. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Piritek (UK) v Robert Jackson [2018] EWHC 2030 (QB), Nicklin J imposed a 20 weeks’ sentence suspended for the period of two years against a defendant who, in continually breaching an injunction restraining him from publishing defamatory remarks about the Claimant, was found in contempt of court. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost maintains that “[p]olitical differences aside, a common-sense reading of Kavanaugh’s testimony shows that he is ready if confirmed to vote to overrule the abortion-rights decision Roe v. [read post]