Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
Any such right (if there had been one) was displaced by the Clean Air Act and the actions taken by the US EPA, because the statute addressed precisely those gas emissions which were the subject of the litigation. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm
I focus on the use of the standard in an extremely fuzzy area of the law: the law of copyright. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm
In K-Tech Telecommunications v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
The statement is technically accurate, insofar as there is no other FISA authority that precisely replicates Section 702. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
In Spierer v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 7:22 am
If you have knowledge of Defense Contractor Fraud, we encourage you to contact us for a free and confidential consultation. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
The representation of scents and other marks not comprised in the list, ‘shall comply with the standards set out in paragraph 1 and may be accompanied by a description’ (art 3(4)). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm
" The post DEI Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
If Roberts’s concurrence becomes the standard for testing the constitutionality of abortion regulations, the courts will not have to consider whether abortion restrictions have any benefit for patients, as Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:57 am
These are also precisely the activities about which plaintiff complains here. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm
A: Copyright laws differ between jurisdictions, but commentators often overstate the scope of the opinion by the Court of Justice of the EU in SAS Institute v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:56 pm
The People of the State of California v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
Army Field Manual (V. 3-09, Sect. 1-115) acknowledges that in order to avoid collateral damage, the use of artillery in an urban setting requires “more detailed and restrictive rules of engagement. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm
This standard is used to determine whether Myriad’s patents claim a "new and useful . . . composition of matter," §101, or claim naturally occurring phenomena. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:47 am
Supreme Court continued its recent trend of imposing more stringent standards for class certification in Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:03 am
Last Friday, in Finisar Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
I was especially exited [sic] to hear you encourage us to exercise our second amendment gun rights. [read post]
