Search for: "People v Catchings" Results 781 - 800 of 1,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 6:30 am by Francisco Macías
  In fact, every one of the titles, in some way or another, is eye-catching. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:07 am by Alex Loomis
Judge Sri Srinivasan, writing for a three judge panel in Simon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
There was a catch, however: the New York Fire Department refused to permit it. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:57 am by SHG
He escaped from the hospital and the Pinehurst police were called to catch him. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:35 am by Dave Maass
" Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am by INFORRM
 In Brand v Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB), a masseuse was held to have harassed celebrity couple, Russell Brand and Jemima Khan, by accusing them of serious criminal offending in the media, in emails to numerous people, and in an online petition. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:56 am by Venkat Balasubramani
However, the court did find that the approximately 9,200 people who had unauthorized charges adequately allege standing despite getting reimbursed. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:49 am by Dr. Cassandra Steer
Many people have a basic understanding that the high seas belong to no-one. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm by Ad Law Defense
** Courts Are Inconsistently Grappling With the Question of Whether a Plaintiff Has Standing for an Injunction Prohibiting Misleading Behavior if They are Aware of the Behavior ** . . . [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
LTD. v. uCOOL, INC. https://t.co/DyoGX8FYr2 -> Use of photo in blog post is fair use says US CA Katz v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
Jewel v NSA, First Unitarian Church v NSA, and Smith v Obama in the Ninth Circuit A week after the Wikimedia ruling, the U.S. [read post]