Search for: "People v Welcome" Results 781 - 800 of 2,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am by INFORRM
We welcome posts on all topics relating to media and the law – particularly from international contributors. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:21 am
Scott joined us at the federal district court hearing of AAR v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:23 am by Bria Nelson
I went to law school in Kansas, and I stayed here because of the powerful community I found: organizers and activists who are “Midwest nice,” working tirelessly to make Kansas a more welcoming place for people like me — Black people, LGBTQIA people, and people with disabilities. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm by Mark Summerfield
  That turned out to be a good call, especially when the Apple v Samsung patent litigation kicked off in Australia about a year later. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am by Katie Bart
Welcome, Lawrence, Andrew and Andrea, and thank you for doing this. *** Question: When did your investigation into qualified immunity begin? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The campaign has been welcomed by the chair of the Scottish Law Commission. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
” This memo actually supported letting the people vote on marriage. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Sandy Levinson
"  If political “leaders” won’t respond, then “We the People” should exercise our right under Article V of the Constitution to demand a new constitutional convention that would do what the Supreme Court refuses to do—safeguard our democracy. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:19 pm by Katie Hoeppner
Since the early 1990s, our nation has welcomed and assisted people whose countries have been devastated by war and natural disaster through the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:10 am by Amy Howe
” When the justices hear oral argument next week in Animal Science Products v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am by Michael Dorf
   That should not have been a fully satisfactory response to the Establishment Clause objection, because it fails to answer the question of why the government can lift burdens it has created for people with religious scruples but not for people with other sorts of scruples. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He sought to find a way to unite secularists and people of faith in a shared practice of democratic discourse, a practice from which none are excluded, in which all participate on terms of mutual respect, and in which none are required to hide, suppress, or, “cover” their identity.[10]  While assessments vary[11]—some would see condescension in a practice of inclusion and religious accommodation that has the explicit goal of making religious groups less insular and… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm by E. R. Wrigley
Sir Nicholas Wall’s decision to open these closed doors should be welcomed. [read post]