Search for: "People v. Sullivan" Results 781 - 800 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
New York Times Co. v Sullivan and later libel cases do offer a defense for false speech about public people or entities—which Dominion may be held to be—if it was uttered without what the Court has characterized as “serious doubt” of its truth or a “high degree of awareness” of its probable falsity. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Facebook will also launch a new scam ads reporting tool and a dedicated team of people to act upon such reports. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:01 am by Sean Quirk
Secretary of State Antony Blinken and National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan publicly expressed their concerns about the PRC actions toward the end of March. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 4:29 am by SHG
Even Andrew Sullivan explains its “win” in religious terms. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette reports that Charlotte Church is suing the The People newspaper for a story that alleged she proposed to her boyfriend while drunk and singing karaoke in a pub. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Oral Argument Chief Judge Robert Katzmann and Judges Christopher Droney and Richard Sullivan heard the case. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:15 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Sullivan, or restrictive covenants under Shelley v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:17 am by SHG
Sullivan, not that Goldberg cares much about this nuance. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am by Ackerman Law Office
 Whittin v Luck In Whittin v Luck people began renting house in May 2009. [read post]