Search for: "Peters v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 5,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his defense.3. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:17 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
          [1] Haseeb v Imperial Oil The post Human Rights Tribunal Again Sets New Law appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 10:17 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
          [1] Haseeb v Imperial Oil The post Human Rights Tribunal Again Sets New Law appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:57 am by Raffaela Wakeman
As we begin a week of pre-trial sessions in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 12:18 am by Peter Hirtle
(posted by Peter Hirtle) One of the more interesting recent conflicts in the Georgia ereserves case concerns an expert report on ereserves prepared by Kenneth Crews of Columbia for the defendants. [read post]
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:32 am by Shannon Walker
In a status report filed in federal district court on Friday, Peter Zimroth discussed the department’s compliance with court orders issued in three civil rights lawsuits—Daniels v. [read post]