Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 6:03 am
In 2009, the First Department held in Phillips v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
These decisions are Phillips et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
For The Washington Post, Amber Phillips offers “a step-by-step rundown of key moments in the debate on gambling in America that got us to this monumental one. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 5:15 am
Phillips [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Take for example, the case in Phillips v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:28 am
In Wherry v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
Lord Phillips – Law Lady Hale – Law Lord Mance – Law Lord Kerr – Law Lord Clarke – Law Lord Reed – Law Lord Carnwath – Law Lord Hope – Classics Lord Walker – Classics and Law Lord Dyson – Classics Lord Sumption – History Lord Wilson – Jurisprudence Lord Neuberger – Chemistry [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am
Constitution Daily looks at Peruta v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm
” Vitronics Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
KATHRYN AND JEREMY MEDLEN, No. 12-0047 – which damages Texas law allows for loss of a pet PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, GPM GAS CORPORATION, PHILLIPS GAS MARKETING COMPANY... v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Runyon v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:21 am
’s reasons for judgment from the hearing in which the expert’s evidence was considered: Phillips v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:18 am
Phillips v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:45 pm
Jeffrey Phillips, and are assigned to the University of Missouri. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
Sprinkled among them was Patterson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:36 am
In Wallace v. [read post]
