Search for: "Rodriguez v. State" Results 781 - 800 of 2,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 7:01 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state –Mis-describing self-defense Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, of second-degree assault and reckless endangerment, Marvin Coreas-Rodriguez, appellant, noted this appeal, raising the following question for our review: Did the circuit court err in allowing the State to make four allegedly improper and prejudicial ... [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:54 am by Kent Scheidegger
Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 487(1973), it must be brought, if at all, under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:21 am by Jeremy Saland
Beyond the knowledge piece, the court further stated that “‘there was no reason for defendant to knowingly possess [such] false identity document[] unless he intended to present [it] as real, i.e., to defraud or deceive another'” (People v Rodriguez, 71 AD3d 450, 453 [2010], affd 17 NY3d 486 [2011]). [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:21 am by Jeremy Saland
Beyond the knowledge piece, the court further stated that “‘there was no reason for defendant to knowingly possess [such] false identity document[] unless he intended to present [it] as real, i.e., to defraud or deceive another'” (People v Rodriguez, 71 AD3d 450, 453 [2010], affd 17 NY3d 486 [2011]). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:21 am by Alyson Grine
By now, most court actors are familiar with the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:21 am by Alyson Grine
By now, most court actors are familiar with the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:42 pm by Amy Howe
  In the second case of the day, Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:59 am by Robin Shea
*Amy Beth Dambeck of our Princeton Office has an excellent analysis of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]