Search for: "SHARP v. UNITED STATES"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard 9-13, 18, 24-25 March 2015 (Mann J). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:24 pm
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
See Sharpe, 470 U. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
United States The defamation trial against HBO over a “hoax” child labour report has begun with a statement by the attorney for Mitre Sports International. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
United States and James v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in Glik v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
United States The woman who accused Prince Andrew of sexual abuse now faces action for defamation by another target of her allegations. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
”Yesterday, the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm
Kishore Mahbubani, Singapore’s former ambassador to the United Nations, argues that the city-state is at an “inflection point” . [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:35 pm
"The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case was a surprise, as the court last year temporarily blocked the law for the November election, and voters were not required to show photo identifications in order to vote," writes Adam Liptak in the NYT.A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Chicago, upheld the law, reasoning that it was similar to one from Indiana that the Supreme Court had sustained in 2008 in Crawford… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:12 am
Thinking about quotas must be a comparative endeavor given their remarkable popularity outside the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
It is reported that 90% of voters in the United States support the right to delete links to personal information. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]