Search for: "STATE v. PORTER" Results 781 - 800 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2024, 10:26 am by Jacob Fishman
Susan Chesler & Elizabeth Porter, Contracting for the Company’s Culture, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Paper No. 4928148 (August 30, 2024) Company culture is not a new phenomenon. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
L’audience ne doit porter que sur une question limitée. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:13 am by Peter Mahler
In its unanimous decision handed down last week in Matter of Hoffman v S.T.H.M. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Nolo, 2010.Capital PunishmentKFT565.C2 T46 2010Tennessee's new abolitionists : the fight to end the death penalty in the volunteer state / edited by Amy L. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:20 am
  Judge Elizabeth Magner, in McCain v Ocwen, ______________, stated that the evidence adduced i [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Freedman Presidential Professor, Dartmouth College), Ethan Porter (Assistant Professor, George Washington University), Timothy J. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Their approach centers on the idea that Marvel and Disney intellectual properties, especially characters, compete for the attention of the same market. [ 14 ] Several of these analysts point out that Disney has repeatedly tried and failed to capture the young male market share with their characters, especially in the television and film realms, but succeeded with young women. [ 15 ] These analysts point to Marvel’s strong hold on young males and weakness towards female in the comic book… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  The three most recent full trials are Hughes v Risbridger (2010 EWHC 491 (QB)) Berezovsky v Russian Television (10 March 2010 EWHC 476 (QB)) and Gary Flood v Times Newspapers (16 October 2009 EWHC 2375 (QB)). [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Carter Ruml
Image: Wikimedia Commons (public domain) KYEstates is pleased to share welcome news of a taxpayer win in Estate of Black v. [read post]