Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 4,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 12:13 pm
United States, 590 F.3d 866 (D.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
United States (Al-Bahlul II), which upheld the petitioner’s conviction for conspiracy. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
There is an ineffective assistance case where trial counsel did not introduce expert testimony of battered woman syndrome in a case where duress was the defense, United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:45 am
United States [Originalist Brief]. 2. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:32 am
In 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Navarette v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 1:01 am
Ginsburg has authored notable majority opinions, including United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:41 am
Conroy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
United States, a “clear enough” — as opposed to, perhaps, a crystal clear — Chevron step one inquiry. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
” The cases This hypothesis is easily testable at the Supreme Court level because all of the relevant data are available, mainly from the United States Supreme Court Database. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Kentucky, the Supreme Court ruled that failure of a defense attorney to inform a client that a collateral consequence of their felony plea could lead to the client’s (in this case, a forty-year permanent resident in the United States) deportation constituted deficient performance by the attorney.[8] Two years later, in Missouri v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:34 am
As he put it in a concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
