Search for: "Scott v. Scott et al"
Results 781 - 800
of 816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
” I suspect that reform may be kicked into the long grass tonight by the Tory rebels et al – not a matter over which I shall lose much sleep given the rather more pressing problems facing the country at the moment which require mature political thought and action. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Upper Deck et al (CAFC 2009-1022) precedential The facts supposedly uncontested, the decision was a treated as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: Spirituality, Virtue, and Technology Ethics” "If one loves righteousness, whose works are virtues,She teaches moderation and prudence, righteousness and fortitude, and nothing in life is more useful than these. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
., et al. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
News & Analysis 11111-11114 (2010).Batker, David, et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
By Seoryung Blair Park Image by Iryna Khomenko via Shutterstock: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/nft-theme-design-nonfungible-token-sign-1935174506Looking at NFTs and seeing dollar signs was recently a common affliction. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
