Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
In both civil and criminal cases, the trial judge is the only person in a courtroom whose primary concern, indeed primary duty, is to ensure the selection of a fair and impartial jury. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:08 pm
Any higher standard of actual proof, the RIAA said, would "cripple" copyright enforcement in the digital age. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
P. 51 requires a litigant to make a timely objection to a jury instruction in order to challenge that instruction on appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:14 am
When that food became significantly rodent-invested, the FDA proceeded with criminal charges. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:45 pm
And to quote the last part of the standard jury instruction in criminal cases, "no one of us has the right to violate those laws. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:42 am
Nonetheless, for citizens trying to evaluate the evidence they have heard during the proceedings before the House Intelligence Committee, it may be helpful to refer to some of the standard instructions that a jury would be given in a criminal case under similar circumstances. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:59 am
Since this is standard language, to give it scope-widening powers would undo the c [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:03 am
As the Court in Miller noted, in North Carolina, there is no pattern jury instruction that expressly addresses the defense of necessity. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am
The jury in the Robertson case was instructed to use the Kennedy “significant nexus” test in determining that the tributary Robertson polluted was in fact regulated by the CWA. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
Numerius, the governor of Narbonensis, was on trial before the Emperor, and, contrary to the usage in criminal cases, the trial was public. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
While the trial court acknowledged that there would probably be criminal liability during the school year, in this case it was outside the scope of the job and the statute. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm
As for the per se prong, the judge instructed jury, in accordance with the pattern jury instructions and G.S. 20-138.1(a)(2), that “[t]he results of a chemical analysis are deemed sufficient evidence to prove a person’s alcohol concentration. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:47 pm
If you have been indicted for the crime of grand larceny or petit larceny, you will need to be represented by a Dutchess Grand Larceny Attorney and/or Dutchess Criminal Attorney in order to defend your case and provide the possible legal remedies available to your case. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Parties make oral agreement for property purchase, buyer pays $35,500, but no written agreement signed; buyer entitled to return of money, as part payment doesn’t take case out of statute of frauds requirement that sale of real property be in writing, says 6th District… 2nd District holds that trial court erred in not granting continuance of trial date when plaintiff’s counsel withdrew 17 days before trial… Plaintiff should have submitted ssue of award of… [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:55 am
A death sentence that is arbitrarily imposed or handed down without proper consideration of mitigating evidence -- evidence about the crime or the defendant that suggests the death penalty is inappropriate -- is cruel and unusual and unconstitutional.Can our criminal justice system ensure that a death sentence meets these constitutional standards? [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:05 pm
Turning to trials, will defendants accused of possessing firearms in connection with drug dealing now be able to demand that the jury be given a Second Amendment instruction? [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 12:24 pm
The district attorney’s office requested the standard two attorney representation in capital cases. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 11:18 am
In what steps, what instructions that he’s supposed to give. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Rather, it remanded the case to the Oregon Supreme Court to determine whether there had been a procedural-due-process violation in the trial judge’s instructions to the jury. [read post]
