Search for: "Stark v. Stark"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 4:07 pm
But even where the Ninth Circuit panel in this particular case -- Judges Callahan, Nguyen and Bress -- so inclined (and they're not), the stark facts of the underlying crimes would make it very surprising were this case to have come out any different than it did.Which, by definition, it didn't.It's a death penalty case from Arizona, and even though it's taken 32 years (!) [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
No Factual Invasions, Only Pretend = Prison.It's that anomaly that seems stark. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 10:55 am
Stark, like other Floridians, want a free lunch. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
And King presents a stark choice between the two. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
’” Chickasaw Nation v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 10:44 am
G.H. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:00 am
And that brings us to Epic Medical Management v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 4:43 pm
Strengthen open record office - the Star-Advertiser's editorial: "In a stark rebuke of Gov. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:10 pm
Benson (1998) and State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:52 am
by Dennis Crouch KPN v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:05 am
The cleanup continues with NIFLA v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:02 pm
’ Starks v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:35 pm
R. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:06 pm
Circuit decision of July, the 8th, John Doe VIII v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:24 pm
There is a lot that is of interest in the judgment, including an intriguing apparently obiter suggestion of repairing duties to tolerated trespassers and a partial vindication of James Stark on Payne v Cooper (Hi James!). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
Making imposition of the fee legitimate.So I was worried about the stark inequity of a $300,000 fee at the beginning. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
The chilling effects of the Fifth Circuit’s rule are too stark to decide otherwise. [read post]
