Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 781 - 800
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Another issue: WTO is now undertaking role in enforcing treaties; no longer a role for WIPO—development agenda comes on board only as WIPO loses relevance. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
States also have a corresponding obligation to regulate the protection of human rights in sport, and to provide access to efficient and effective legal remedies for cases of discrimination or other human rights abuses by sporting bodies or private actors.4. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Under the study, EPA researchers, in collaboration with outside experts from the public and private sector, will examine the impacts of: large volume water withdrawals from ground and surface waters; surface spills resulting from hydraulic fracturing fluids; the injection and fracturing process; surface spills of flowback and produced water; and wastewater treatment and waste disposal. 2. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais was featured in “Medically Devised,” an article profiling Kirkland as a finalist for the America Lawyer’s 2006 IP Litigation Department of the Year. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am
A bunch of doctors and medical organizations filed suit to enjoin the law. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Mukasey, No. 05-4448 Petition for review of a decision denying petitioner asylum and related relief, and finding that he was removable due to a prior state conviction for possession of a controlled substance, is denied where a remand was unnecessary because petitioner's challenge to the state court conviction constituted an impermissible collateral attack, and he presented no other claims that would entitle him to relief. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (The Invent Blog), Impressive work on history of ‘Happy Birthday’ and copyright protection: (Innovationpartners), Gender and copyright: (Patry Copyright Blog) Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 1-2 July – C5 conference on intellectual asset management for high-tech industries – Paris: (c5-online.com), 2… [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:58 am
In Estate of Adell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am
Joshua Rozenberg, A Lawyer Writes: Unintended consequences: is the new system of medical examiners allowing GPs to dump work on coroners? [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 2:00 pm
Four months later, on 17 July 2023, from the Royal Free Hospital, Dr Petrosino wrote to the Defendant stating that the diagnoses for the Claimant were: severe medical conditions requiring invasive procedures for both diagnosis and therapy. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
A recent example of this followed the Hillsborough disaster and the Taylor report which examined it. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
A jury, after hearing live testimony and cross-examination, might therefore discredit the officers’ testimony and conclude that, in light of the degree of danger Keith posed once handcuffed, if any, and other pertinent circumstances (including Keith’s apparent physical and mental state at the time), the degree of force used was excessive. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Board of Education, Engel v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm
The Act contains a strong privative clause, which states, Jurisdiction 118 (1) The Board has exclusive jurisdiction to examine, hear and decide all matters and questions arising under this Act, except where this Act provides otherwise. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In its decision, the Board goes to great lengths, as is reflected by the length of today’s post. [read post]
