Search for: "State v. C. Johnson" Results 781 - 800 of 1,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v Village of Bloomingburg, 2015 WL 3604300 (SDNY 6/9/2015) The opinion and order can be accessed at: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id=1202729033706/Bloomingburg-Jewish-Education-Center-et-al-Plaintiffs-v-Village-of-Bloomingburg-New-York-et-al-Defendants-14cv7250-KBF Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, RLUIPA Tagged: hasidism and zoning, mikva and zoning, zoning discrimination [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
  Section 512(c)(3)(A)(v) of the DMCA states that, as part of the written notice, a statement must be made by the copyright owner that it "has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
For the respondents: Bruce McClintock SC and Matthew Richardson instructed by Mark O’Brien, Paul Svilans and Andrea Rejante of Johnson Winter & Slattery. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
He writes that, unlike agencies, which can choose any reasonable interpretation of ambiguous text: [c]ourts . . . must give the statute its single, most plausible, reading. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the "reasonable efforts" requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:56 am by Stephen Bilkis
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the “reasonable efforts” requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision… [read post]