Search for: "State v. Fees"
Results 781 - 800
of 20,979
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 4:03 pm
As we stated in Williams v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:58 pm
Robinson (requiring district court to make findings before imposing BIDS recoupment fee) also applies to the $100 BIDS application fee.Pat Dunn had a PR granted in State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:53 pm
” Under decisions in Nollan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:19 am
In their recent May 2, 2014 Opinion in the case of Doctor’s Choice Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Center, P.C. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 8:51 am
These plaintiffs asserted that the impact fees violated the Utah Impact Fees Act and constituted a taking under the state and federal constitutions. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
That happened in this case.The case is Albunio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 12:03 am
In Northwest Energetic Services, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:19 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
On December 4, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States granted review in CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:13 pm
In Anderson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 11:36 am
Shammas v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:54 am
The law as stated in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
Personnel services company pays $9.9 million to settle False Claims Act case for underpaid Visa Fees
10 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
Michael Harmon v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
” In Jankey v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 1:14 pm
Serrano v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:27 am
In Kennedy Hodges LLP v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:53 pm
Stevens states that because he charges his client’s a flat fee he is selective in his case selection, agreeing to represent clients, who, for instance are reasonable in their expectations. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:08 pm
Iowa 2014); East Sussex Children Servs. v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 3:55 pm
See Animal Welfare Institute v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 11:36 am
In the third suit, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al. v. [read post]