Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 781 - 800 of 1,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2014, 7:05 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
In Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited, the contract between the parties stated as follows: “11.1 In case of any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with or under this LTC … the Parties shall first seek to resolve the dispute or claim by friendly discussion….. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:28 am by David Lynn
  The outcome of this case may give the SEC some hope that the Court will reverse the three-judge panel’s holding that the Dodd-Frank Act conflict minerals disclosure rules violate the First Amendment in National Association of Manufacturers, et al., v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, American Risk Insurance Company, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
SEC (the conflict minerals case) was an administrative law victory for the SEC. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
The Governing Body and Its ResponsibilitiesIn January 2000, the State Council formed the Western Region Development Leading Group headed by Premier Zhu Rongji, deputy headed by Vice Premier Wen Jiabao and attended by 19 directors from the State Council and relevant ministries. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:49 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
Fiduciary Duty Means Special Legal Responsibility for the Real Estate Agent As the Florida Supreme Court has explained long ago in Quinn v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
  The likelihood of IPF, however, will be relatively low in a cohort of asbestos miners, and thus not a serious source of error. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that effects many Texas property and mineral owners. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Don Cruse
Workers compensation death benefits STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]