Search for: "State v. Stock"
Results 781 - 800
of 6,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The two men also agreed to not sign any Sarbanes-Oxley certifications or file certain periodic reports with the Commission for a period of 12 months and to not violate the federal securities laws (SEC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:49 am
The Commission also “alleges that, in connection with its two public stock offerings in late 2009, CNEP falsely stated to investors in a registration statement and other public filings . . . that the offering proceeds would be used to fund future business expansion and for general working capital purposes”, but that portions of the offering proceeds were diverted as part of the related-party transactions at issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Schartz v Parish, 2016 WL 7231613 (N.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Employee Stock Options and Mergers and Acquisitions Posted by Ilona Babenko, Arizona State University, on Friday, August 12, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Acquisitions, Bidders, Equity-based compensation, Mergers & acquisitions, Stock options,Takeover premiums, Target firms, Tech companies Stakes Go Up In SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Wayne M. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 12:21 pm
Quaglia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
Simon v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:14 am
In Longpath Capital, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 5:08 pm
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari to review the Second Circuit’s decision in the ”foreign-cubed” securities class action Morrison v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
According to Vermeule, “[t]he stock distinction between the Enlightenment’s twins—communism is violently coercive while liberalism allows freedom of thought—is glib. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:59 am
After a month long recess the United States Supreme Court is back in session and ready to rule in Wyeth v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:26 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Cyan Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
This case examines the territorial reach of that statute.The case is Meng-Lin v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 6:42 pm
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc., (ND CA, April 9, 2013), involves the question of whether Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when it failed to hire a Muslim teenager, Halla Banafa, as a part-time stock-room employee. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:40 pm
Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:57 am
In FDA v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
stock. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:03 am
The defendant demurred, stating that it did not have $250 million in legally available funds, i.e., surplus funds within the meaning of Section 513 of the Business Corporation Law. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
United States, concluding that (contra the position advanced by the IRS), stocks do not constitute "money renumeration" and are therefore not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm
Traditional Village of Togiak (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Banishment) United States v. [read post]
