Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 781 - 800 of 20,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Keaoleboga Molefe
The applicant failed to persuade the Western Cape High Court to extend the right to privately cultivate cannabis established in the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince [2018] ZACC 30 to grow clubs. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am by NCC Staff
In 1978, Justice William Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:51 pm by Rich McHugh
The United States Supreme Court today issued an opinion in King v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:19 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Dissent in County of Riverside v McLaughlin Justice Marshall authored a dissent, which was joined by Justices Blackmun and Stevens. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
[Well, it's Judge Bradford Thomas of the Florida Court of Appeal, but still an interesting synthesis of recent criticisms, with some extra analysis added.] [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm by Benson Varghese
Justice Sotomayor (concurring): While still disagreeing with Bruen, she joins the majority opinion as it correctly applies Bruen’s test and provides helpful guidance to lower courts. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm by Benson Varghese
Justice Sotomayor (concurring): While still disagreeing with Bruen, she joins the majority opinion as it correctly applies Bruen’s test and provides helpful guidance to lower courts. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 12:54 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Supreme Court Overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:38 am by MBettman
  Still, the Court is far from unified on many issues, as the blog regularly reports. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:38 am by Amy Howe
The justices could still act on the providers’ request at any time. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 6:17 am by Howard Friedman
That delegation still threatens to invade a constitutional right, and the coming into effect of that delegation still threatens imminent harm.Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Breyer and Kagan, filed a dissenting opinion, saying in part:The Court’s order is stunning. [read post]