Search for: "Strange v. Powers" Results 781 - 800 of 970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
What makes the case interesting (at least to copyright nerds) is, first off, the strange little retroactivity element in the final disposition. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am by Skylar Hunter
With respect to the latter point, one need only look back at a 2018 decision (San Francisco Police Officers’ Assn. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:50 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: "Supreme Court Talks Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" pjblack.me/wIQX1h a very strange copyright lawsuit: "Keep Your Hands off My Briefs: Lawyers Sue Westlaw, Lexis" pjblack.me/xpIT5K #lwb486 too little, too late to save flickr? [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  We don't know yet which case will be 1 F.4th 1, but it might possibly end up being this case that seems to have the lowest Westlaw citation number:  Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm by Jon
  It is clear that the government it trying to grossly expand its power to control the people’s basic rights of freedom of speech, expression and action regarding monetary policy. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:05 pm by Adam Levitin
(Perhaps he'd have preferred the CFPB to address no-downpayment mortgages separately, using the UDAAP power...) [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
” Clark Cunningham I highly recommend Jonathan Mahler’s The Challenge: Hamdan v Rumsfeld and the Fight over Presidential Power From the back jacket: “The Challenge is a rare achievement — a book as involving as it is important. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:03 am by Anup Surendranath
The equalisation argument is essentially based on a false premise.Note: I would also like to point out the decision of the Supreme Court in Suraj Bhan Meena v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:32 am
The Court, reviewing case law on the role of the adviser, noted that the power to call on the assistance of an advisor was introduced as long ago as 1883 but that it had rarely been invoked. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Court of Appeal has been given a similar power to divert from CJEU case law, section 6(4)(b)(i) and (5A) of the amended European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 3:52 am by SHG
Two V’s don’t work right now: voting and vaccines. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
We do not accept however that the family consultant exercises any “power” in preparing a family report. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am by Michael Froomkin
The Supreme Court recently addressed this very issue in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
  The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]