Search for: "Thomas v. Smith"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,570
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Louis V. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:06 am
Smith. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:10 am
Smith and Jennifer L. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:00 am
" Matney, 210 S.W.2d at 983 (quoting Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Thomas Sinks, G. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
” Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
Monday’s decisions in Perez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
Thanks to the Thomas More Society, for letting us represent them here, and to my students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith, who worked on the brief. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
Bryant further muddled things in various ways; and Justice Thomas’s insistence on a narrow formality test created confusion in Williams v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA… [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
Bryant further muddled things in various ways; and Justice Thomas’s insistence on a narrow formality test created confusion in Williams v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
A tale of Dudes and Smoothies Katfriend Richard Kempner discusses Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision addressing the copyright ownership in the ‘Dude’, ie the logo used on Innocent’s smoothie bottle in the past 15 years. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
Rockefeller Distinguished Lecture Series presentations in Fort Smith, Arkansas. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
We have a problem when it comes to stopping mass surveillance. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:02 am
“The analysis is a balancing act,” wrote Rothstein in a 6-1 ruling in Tervita Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Smith; and that (3) his attorney had ineffectively argued in closing that “I feel like I ought to just sit down,” because if the jury chose a death sentence, “I can’t quarrel with that” – referred to as a “Spisak error” after the Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Texas contends that the text of the Act must be read to prohibit only disparate treatment because of the Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:08 am
Inc. v. [read post]
