Search for: "U.S. v. Contractor"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 8:06 am
In one of the first cases against a corporation under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), Ramchandra Adhikari v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 7:43 am
U.S., 2023 WL 2146598 (Fed. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 3:18 pm
U.S., No. 2020-1538 (Fed. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
For contractors who often subject to one or more of federal environmental laws or regulations, below is a brief report on some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided since late June of 2015 by jurisdiction: District of Columbia Energy Future Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 7:01 am
In Fox Logistics & Construction Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:24 pm
Using the authority of Bivens v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am
As both parties recognize, claims of common law derivative immunity are relatively commonplace for domestic contractors working with the U.S. government. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:44 am
Contractors of Cal, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:33 pm
Plumer, 380 U.S. 460, 465 (1965). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:29 am
Luce v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
The case is Lockheed Martin Corporation v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:10 pm
“All government contractors have a responsibility to follow the obligations and protocols set forth by their contracts,” said U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm
Critics say the practice raises questions of freedom of association under the Bill of Rights, and the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:25 pm
Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:37 am
In Viet v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 6:50 am
Trump (2017 U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 4:34 am
Circuit's decision “expressly contradicted” the Supreme Court's landmark mandamus-related ruling in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]