Search for: "US v. London"
Results 781 - 800
of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
Against that, in Prospect Estates Ltd v Grosvener Estates Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1281 (discussed by us here) focused on actual and permitted use (lease only allowed c.11.5% of the property to be used for residential purposes). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
By Ryan Gist and Ronnie London. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Golieb Fellow in Legal History, NYU School of LawMore information is available here.If you convene a legal history workshop or lecture series, please send us your lineup! [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
In London Christian Radio Ltd. v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre, (Ct. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:32 pm
And it was the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kelo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:50 pm
Mayor London Breed recently introduced a proposed ballot initiative that would create massive exceptions to the law’s requirement that police get permission from democratically elected Supervisors before using or acquiring any new surveillance technology. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:41 am
The post also provides a useful recap on all events, which lead to the July 2021 hearing.Rose followed with a post on the EBA’s decision concerning double patenting. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:26 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Michael Hutchinson, partner at Mayer Brown LLP, and is based on a legal update by Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:15 am
, Presentation at 7th Annual RLI Conference, London, 21-23 June 2023 [text]Disasters, crises and violence against women: Evidence from big data analysis - Lessons from Kiribati, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Tonga (UN Women, June 2023) [text]"Gender and Forced Displacement: Ukrainian Women Refugees in Poland," Chapter in Migration, Displacement and Diversity: The IRiS Anthology (Oxford Publishing Services, March 2023) [ResearchGate]Gendered impact of the conflict in the… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 am
South Africa: Three new trade mark judgementsInternational Patent Forum 2014, 18 - 19 March, London - Afro-IP reader discount rate insideSpecial mention is made to the IPKat weblog, our guest bloggers and our readership both local to the continent and internationally, all of whom continue to support the journey into the heart of African IP which is appreciated; the blog continues to boast the single largest resource of searchable information on recent African IP news.We… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:03 am
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:56 pm
Greater London Council and another, [1988] 3 All E.R. 737. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:35 am
Rowe v London Borough of Haringey (2022) EWCA Civ 1370 A Court of Appeal decision which has broader significance for considering overcrowding and whether it is reasonable for a homeless applicant to remain in accommodation in an HMO with shared facilities. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:49 am
R(Cort) v London Borough of Lambeth (2022) EWHC 1085 (Admin) While in some ways this is a decision on an historic context (hopefully), there is a lot in this judgment on local authority approaches to housing in a public health emergency to consider. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm
Fair Use v Fair DealingOf course, Hudson weighs in on the popular debate of whether countries with a closed list of fair dealing exceptions face struggles that can only be resolved by implementing an open-ended fair use system. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:31 am
This issue has recently been addressed in the case of Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
This is something to disappoint the litigation lawyers: Copyright Compliance: practical steps to stay within the law is the title of a very useful work composed by Paul Pedley (Head of Research, Economist Research Unit and Visiting Professor at the London Metropolitan University) and published by Facet Publishing. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 8:00 pm
BackgroundA significant decision in the area of securities laws was handed two days ago by the US Supreme Court in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
