Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
On the other hand, countries are fighting to get their cultural property back to promote their own states’ national identities.[1] The disputed ownership of artifacts in western museums is a well-known global issue. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:36 pm
Massachusetts (1944) (noting that "[t]he right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community … to communicable disease"); United States v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
Indeed, the narrower a definition of imminence that we accept, the more this becomes a problem, since the time frame in which the government could simultaneously demonstrate that a target (1) poses such a threat to the United States; and (2) cannot be captured through less lethal measures [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 6:51 am
These abilities are rooted in the holding in Dusky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Washington Post, which went to court in the cases outlined below to obtain sealed records of these scripted activities, explained how these “sell, sell, sell” seminars operated virtually identically across the country.Cohen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:21 pm
United States, 160 Fed. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Texas Court Rejects Once-Suspended Doctor's Lawsuit Over Reporting of the Suspension
16 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Bds. of the United States, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
United States, 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
The syringes recalled were from a number of lots where there was a concern that unit package seal integrity may have been compromised for some of them. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
In 1974, the Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
In 1974, the Supreme Court, in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, and most state evidentiary law, Schepers’ prior statements are admissible as they bear on his credibility and the truth of his later, scurrilous writings: “When a hearsay statement … has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. [read post]
